DMD 1.032 and 2.016 releases
torhu
no at spam.invalid
Wed Jul 9 16:38:37 PDT 2008
bearophile wrote:
> Walter Bright:
>> bearophile wrote:
>> > At a first test, it seems the compiled executables are 2-3+ times
>> > bigger than the ones produced by 1.029.
>>
>> Hmm, haven't noticed that.
>
> Here are some exact results:
>
> V. 1.029:
> libs: 951_324 bytes (with unittests)
> test.d: 118_300 bytes
>
> V. 1.032:
> libs: 1_386_012 bytes (with unittests)
> test.d: 277_020 bytes
>
> Where the libs are my ones, and the test.d is just:
>
> import std.stdio: put = writef, putr = writefln;
> import std.string: join;
> void main() {
> putr(["ab", "cde"].join(""));
> }
>
> I'd like to know if someone else can confirm this inflation.
I recently tried linking my app with DWT built with 1.031 using -lib,
and the exe was larger than when using 1.027 and dsss with
oneatatime=yes to build DWT. I didn't look into it, just went back to
my 1.027 setup for the time being. So I think you might be onto something.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list