DMD 1.032 and 2.016 releases

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Koroskin Denis" <2korden at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:op.ud4z0co4enyajd at proton.creatstudio.intranet...
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:46:31 +0400, Charles Hixson 
> <charleshixsn at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:40:05 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> BCS wrote:
>>>> If you could test dmd with tango from a single shell script (runs SVN
>>>> up; some tests; etc) would you add that to the pre release tests?
>>>
>>> The problem with that is if it fails, then I will be debugging Tango
>>> (and every other project). It's not practical.
>>
>> Maybe new releases of dmd 1.x could be called rc (release candidate)
>> until they'd been tested for unexpected regressions?
>>
>> I *do* think that limiting the testing to "approved major projects" is a
>> bad idea, but it might be a *very* good idea to have different labels
>> when a release is hoped to be ready, and when it's been tested by many
>> users.
>
> Stable versions are marked as such in a download page 
> (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/download.html).
> Latest stable version to date is 1.030, but not 1.032.

Yes, although it might be nice to have a way (such as the "rc" suffix) for 
the information about which releases are and are not stable to be retained 
farther back than just the most recent stable version.