DMD 1.033 (typeof() error instantiating in template)

[Bill Baxter]

David L. Davis wrote:
> BCS Wrote:
> 
>> Reply to David,
>>
>>> I'll leave that up Walter to decide if the risk to existing D v1.xxx
>>> code is very low as to whether he'll leave the valid D v1.xxxx
>>> statement "typeof(T2) v2" as an error
>>>
>> His stance is that typeof(Type) is /not/ valid, D1.0 or D2.0.
>>
>>
> Got it, thanks.
> 
> David L. Davis

Yes, it was reported as a bug (multiple times?) already.  And the bugs 
were closed as invalid by Walter.  Also mentioned on the NG here a few 
times I think.  But you're right, it did break a lot of code.  And it's 
not always easy to tell why.

--bb