Adding Unicode operators to D
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Sat Oct 25 08:41:58 PDT 2008
Yigal Chripun wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> "Bill Baxter" wrote
>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <spam at here.lot> wrote:
>>>> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> (like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
>>>>> DOS console in Windows to display UTF-8)
>>>> Console is a legacy technology (you even still call it "DOS"), why expect
>>>> features from it?
>>> So tell me what the alternative is? I had trouble with running D
>>> tools from a Cygwin shell. Can't remember if I tried MSYS or not.
>> Any text-based program uses the same Windows console (unless it's a GUI
>> application, and it uses controls to create a text box, etc). Including
>> cygwin shell.
>>
>> To say it's a legacy technology is like saying Linux is a legacy technology
>> because it's command line based. It's a false experience promoted by
>> Microsoft to try and spread FUD about OSes that mainly support command line
>> tools, like Linux. But command line tools are extremely useful and
>> powerful, much easier to develop, and IMO easier to use. For instance, if
>> you want to find all files that contain a certain text, grep -R text / and
>> you're done. On windows it's 'click the start menu, select search, wait for
>> the search window to pop up, click on the dog, etc'. Freaking annoying if
>> you ask me ;)
>>
>>
>>> Anyone using a shell for Windows that works and supports UTF-8 properly?
>> I would guess it should work properly, most everything in windows supports
>> unicode. Perhaps you have some configuration setting not set properly? I'd
>> suggest searching msdn.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>>
>
> windows console AKA DOS Box *is* in fact legacy technology. It is
> replaced by MS Powershell which is based on C#. they actually took many
> ideas from Linux and incorporated in it.
Windows has gotten a lot better in the recent times - ever since it
finally started to imitate Unix :o).
> Also, it doesn't have to be either/or situation regarding CLI vs GUI.
> There's Apple's quicksilver (IIRC the name) which is a gui app with CLI
> like interface. it has the best from both worlds. PowerShell is GUI
> based as well. IMO, CLI should be provided as just a widget in the GUI
> world and not a separate entity.
I'm not sure I understand. Widget in the GUI = a window with text in it
living side by side, or embedded with, graphical windows? That's been
the case for a long time.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list