DMD 1.035 and 2.019 releases

[Leandro Lucarella]

Walter Bright, el  4 de septiembre a las 10:26 me escribiste:
> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> >This is one of those things I really dislike about D :(
> >It's really nice that we can override struct initialization, but the fact that 
> >it eliminates the possibility to override it (with a nice syntax) makes it much 
> >less appealing IMHO.
> >The most important point to me, is that old thing about static struct 
> >initializer and struct literals have different syntaxes, and that the static 
> >variant is much more flexible.
> >I would have loved to see the static struct initializer syntax become an 
> >expression. If the problem is ambiguity, why not just prefix the {} braces with 
> >the struct name?
> 
> The static struct initializers more or less are inherited from C. I'd eventually 
> like to abandon them and go completely to the S(args) syntax.

But they are much more flexible than constructor, it's like a constructor
with named arguments! =)

If you add support to named arguments, then I'll agree ;)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROTESTA EN PLAZA DE MAYO: MUSICO SE COSIO LA BOCA
	-- Crónica TV