An alternative to .init

[Manfred_Nowak]

Brad Roberts wrote:

> That just means don't initialize

I know what the semantics of `T= void' is supposed to be, but your 
remark is only a result of Walters overloading of meanings to keywords.

It does not change the fact, that for all types _one_ more possibility 
exists to (not)initialize it, than it has legal values. 

If there is one more possibility, then there are many more; including 
the possibility, that the initial value is in fact `void', i.e. illegal 
as an rvalue.

See
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?
art_group=digitalmars.D.bugs&article_id=15041
for an example that, D in fact uses `void' as an initilization value.

-manfred

-- 
If life is going to exist in this Universe, then the one thing it 
cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion. (Douglas Adams)