Revised RFC on range design for D2

[Michel Fortin]

On 2008-09-13 04:18:20 -0400, Pablo Ripolles <in-call at gmx.net> said:

> After having had some sleep, I kind of support Bill's proposal, that 
> is, head/foot, definitely better than head/toe.  It's like the header 
> and the footer! sounds very reasonable.  Of course I also like 
> fore/aft, but thats because my aeronautical engineering bias.
> 
> tip is too ambiguous.
> 
> tail refers to all what comes after the head, not to its tip.
> 
> Cheers!

Anyone suggested head/rear yet?


-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
http://michelf.com/