QtD 0.1 is out!

[Eldar Insafutdinov]

Mike Parker Wrote:

> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > naryl Wrote:
> > 
> >> Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
> >>> I'm thinking on putting only C++ part of binding to a dll, while statically link D part. With Qt 4.5 out under lgpl we can make QtD under BSD, so this will work.
> >> You mean the Revised BSD License I presume?
> > 
> > It's a subject to discuss. I am not good at licenses.
> 
> The revised (or modified) BSD is the version most commonly used today. 
> In my experience, when people say "BSD License" it's the one they are 
> usually referring to. This is the version of BSD used for Derelict.
> 
> As for the difference, the original BSD included a clause that required 
> derived works to acknowledge the original work. The modified version has 
> no such requirement. You can read more about it on Wikipedia[1].
> 
> I've looked at numerous open source projects over the years which were 
> licensed under the BSD. I can't recall the last time I saw one using the 
>   original version. IMO, using the modified version is a no-brainer.
> 
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses

Okey, if it is the most suitable license, we can go with it.