QtD 0.1 is out!

[grauzone]

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> 
>> We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with cyclic
>> imports. Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not really
>> acceptable. Is there any chance for this to be fixed?
> 
> IMO it is the cyclic import that is the bug ;)

Maybe all cyclic dependency bugs are on purpose, to teach people not to 
use this evil D feature? Yeah, that must it be. I can't explain why else 
these bugs/issues aren't fixed, and why people only reply with 
incredibly useful statements like "but you shouldn't use this feature 
anyway!".

Broken features should be either fixed or removed. This half-assedness 
about it isn't really going to help D.