dmd 1.046 and 2.031 releases

[Tim Matthews]

grauzone wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> のしいか (noshiika) wrote:
>>> Thank you for the great work, Walter and all the other contributors.
>>>
>>> But I am a bit disappointed with the CaseRangeStatement syntax.
>>> Why is it
>>>    case 0: .. case 9:
>>> instead of
>>>    case 0 .. 9:
> 
> Or
>     case [0..10]:
> ?
> 
> Compatible to how list slicing works.
> 
> Ah yes, bikeshed issue, but my solution is more beautiful.
> 
> Also, Walter, did you ever think about doing something about the 
> fall-through-by-default issue? Of course in a way that preserves C 
> compatibility.

Do u mean this 
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html#FinalSwitchStatement