dmd 1.046 and 2.031 releases

[Walter Bright]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> However, that aside, the syntax you have chosen will have a rational
> explanation for its superiority. So can you explain in simple terms why 
> 
>     CaseLabelInt .. CaseLabelInt  eg. case 1: .. case 9:
> 
> is superior than
> 
>     case CaseRange:  eg. case 1 .. 9:
> 
> given that
>   CaseLabelInt ==> case IntegerExpression :
>   CaseRange    ==> IntegerExpression .. IntegerExpression


Because

1.	case X..Y:

looks like

2.	foreach(e; X..Y)
3.	array[X..Y]

yet the X..Y has a VERY DIFFERENT meaning. (1) is inclusive of Y, and 
(2) and (3) are exclusive of Y.

Having a very different meaning means it should have a distinctly 
different syntax.