dmd 1.046 and 2.031 releases

[Brad Roberts]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Robert Jacques wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:01:58 -0400, Walter Bright
>> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>> Robert Jacques wrote:
>>>> (Caveat: most 32-bit compilers probably defaulted integer to int,
>>>> though 64-bit compilers are probably defaulting integer to long.)
>>>
>>> All 32 bit C compilers defaulted int to 32 bits. 64 bit C compilers
>>> are setting int at 32 bits for sensible compatibility reasons.
>>
>> But are the 64-bit compilers setting the internal "integer" type to 32
>> or 64 bits? (I'm not running any 64-bit OSes at the moment to test this)
> 
> Not that I've seen. I'd be very surprised if any did.

>From wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit

model 	short 	int 	long 	llong 	ptrs 	Sample operating systems
LLP64 	16 	32 	32 	64 	64 	Microsoft Win64 (X64/IA64)
LP64 	16 	32 	64 	64 	64 	Most UNIX and UNIX-like systems
                                                (Solaris, Linux, etc)
ILP64 	16 	64 	64 	64 	64 	HAL
SILP64 	64 	64 	64 	64 	64 	 ?