QtD 0.1 is out!

[Frits van Bommel]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Frits van Bommel wrote:
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>> The problem if it detects it in an implementation-defined manner is 
>>> the source code is no longer portable.
>>
>> ... If the result of compilation provably won't *run* anyway, what's 
>> the problem with a compile-time error?
> 
> Nothing, it's just that the compiler cannot prove it is an error.

Not even on a best-effort basis?
It doesn't have to catch every possible case; I for one would be 
perfectly fine with it if it didn't catch the "I omitted a private 
import from my .di file" case...