Taunting

[Nick Sabalausky]

"BCS" <none at anon.com> wrote in message 
news:a6268ff63ac8cba9af2cc64950 at news.digitalmars.com...
> Hello Nick,
>
>> Plus, supporting a shit-but-widespead option severly hinders the
>> chances of something better from getting started or getting widely
>> adopted.
>>
>
> chicken and egg. Until something better comes along, people who *need* to 
> run video in a web page right now will use youtube and flash because it 
> works. Yeah, it might suck, but what else /can/ they do?
>

It's difficult to imagine that that's something that anyone would actually 
*need*, but what they can do is additionally provide a non-youtube/flash 
version. Which should be really f^&*^&* easy since they had to have already 
had one in order to upload it to craptube in the first place.