bugzilla 424 - Unexpected OPTLINK Termination - solved!

[Franklin Minty]

Tim Matthews Wrote:

> Bill Baxter wrote:
> > 
> > So is it any slower now with things not in ASM?
> > 
> > --bb
> > 
> 
> You are not serious are you? The linker not the linked?
> 
> If it's functionally more correct, easier to understand and easier to 
> implement link time optimizations then how can anyone justify asm to c 
> transition (where asm is not required) as a disadvantage?

it will be slower - I want my 100ms back.