dmd 1.048 and 2.033 releases

Denis Koroskin 2korden at gmail.com
Mon Oct 5 06:12:32 PDT 2009


On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:55:49 +0400, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> On 10/5/09 13:49, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:54:22 -0400, Walter Bright
>> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Another OSX 10.5 release :-)
>>>
>>> Anyhow, this should work with gdb now, and has contract inheritance
>>> (finally).
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.048.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.033.zip
>>>
>>> Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update.
>>
>> Excellent work! It looks like a lot of mundane bugs are getting fixed,
>> which is a good sign :)
>>
>> A couple questions:
>>
>> 1. "The result type of the typeid(type) is now the most derived TypeInfo
>> class, rather than the TypeInfo base class" Why can't this be propogated
>> to D1? I can't imagine code that depends on the return value being typed
>> as TypeInfo that would not simply just work with the most derived return
>> type...
>>
>> 2. A while ago, (I can't find the post, it may have been on reddit) you
>> mentioned that you were going to add property notation. Is that still
>> going to happen? I'm really looking forward to that, and if not, is
>> there a reason?
>
> There are some traces of it in the code:  
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/195 search for "property".
>
>> -Steve
>

int bar() @property
{
     return 42;
}

writeln(bar);

Yay! :)


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list