dmd 1.054 and 2.038 release

[Walter Bright]

bearophile wrote:
> Sönke Ludwig:
>> BTW: I was not really watching the newsgroups lately and just
>> noticed the DIP2/inout implementation. IMO 'inout' is really not a
>> good choice for the keyword, introducing a backwards
>> imcompatibility, changing the meaning of a de-facto standard
>> keyword (IDL etc) and not really hitting the point (placeholder for
>> const/immutable/nothing). Also if I did not know about the concept
>> of DIP2 such code would have been a mystery for me.
> 
> It seems that Walter has yet to learn that names are important. Using
> nearly random words (and syntax) to express ideas and features, as
> currently done in D2, is bad. It's the silly "invariant" /
> "immutable" story again.
> 
> Python devs ask all people how to name things before, and then Guido
> V. R. picks the most popular name. They do this because a single
> person may have some bias: what is intuitive for a person (like
> Guido, or Walter, or Andrei) may be not intuitive for most other
> people. Choosing one of the most popular choices can't solve all
> problems, but it helps finding a name/syntax that will result
> intuitive for most future programmers.
> 
> Bye, bearophile

The discussion on the name is here:

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/transporting_qualifier_from_parameter_to_the_return_value_103609.html

And no, it was not random.