dcollections 1.0 and 2.0a beta released
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Wed May 19 13:56:44 PDT 2010
On 05/19/2010 11:09 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> After much work and toil, I have created dcollections for D2.
Awesome! I'm looking through it, unfortunately after wandering in the
trunk for a while (I was like, wait, what?). But that was after all good
because I saw a lot of awesome improvements in the new library. This is
solid work.
I salute your decision to frame complexity as a feature and remove
functions with "undecided complexity". This is huge.
That being said, I think dcollections2 has not yet solved a number of
problems, some minor, some annoying, and some fundamental. This makes
things quite unpleasant because, willingly or not, I'm in a three-way
conflict of interest: (1) I can influence to some extent the decision of
adopting dcollections2 for phobos; (2) I have my own design in mind
which is competing with dcollections2; (3) my time is scarce so I'm
having difficulty executing on that design, whereas dcollections2 is
already usable.
I'm not sure where this leaves us. I'm tempted to post a list of
"grievances" with the current design, but it's difficult to make that
sound sincere due to the conflict of interest. Let me start by asking
this: on a scale of 0 ("no change") to 10 ("redesign the whole thing"),
where do you stand regarding the perspective of operating changes to
dcollections2?
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list