dmd 1.065 and 2.050 release
Nick Treleaven
nospam at example.net
Mon Nov 8 06:04:26 PST 2010
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:19:27 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> I would like to point out that the table in the documentation for
>> std.container is still messed up. Walter, could this be because you
>> are building the docs using win32.mak? When I build with posix.mak it
>> looks fine.
>>
>> -Lars
>
> An unfortunate side effect of how ddoc deals with conditional
> compilation is that any module which wants to produce the same
> documentation with different versions needs to make sure that it has the
> some ddoc comments for each version and possibly adding stubs for
> functions which are platform-specific just so you can have ddoc comments
> on them. std.container probably hasn't done that properly.
Not sure that's the problem, it seems to be only the table cells declared
with $(TDNW ...) that are missing.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5103
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list