dmd 1.065 and 2.050 release

Nick Treleaven nospam at example.net
Mon Nov 8 06:04:26 PST 2010


On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:19:27 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

>> I would like to point out that the table in the documentation for
>> std.container is still messed up.  Walter, could this be because you
>> are building the docs using win32.mak?  When I build with posix.mak it
>> looks fine.
>> 
>> -Lars
> 
> An unfortunate side effect of how ddoc deals with conditional
> compilation is that any module which wants to produce the same
> documentation with different versions needs to make sure that it has the
> some ddoc comments for each version and possibly adding stubs for
> functions which are platform-specific just so you can have ddoc comments
> on them. std.container probably hasn't done that properly.

Not sure that's the problem, it seems to be only the table cells declared 
with $(TDNW ...) that are missing.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5103


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list