dmd 1.069 and 2.054 release

Daniel Murphy yebblies at nospamgmail.com
Sun Jul 10 22:33:26 PDT 2011


"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.1522.1310360091.14074.digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com...

> With that implemented, it would fix the problem for functions, but I'm not 
> sure
> that it would fix the problem for modules. That would depend on how it was
> implemented. As it stands, if you deprecate an entire module, you end up 
> doing
> something like
>
> deprecated:
>
> at the top of the module, which is then going to complain about each 
> symbol in
> the model individually when you use it. Ideally, you could make it 
> complain
> about the module when it's imported (and then maybe the specific functions 
> on
> top of that), and that syntax doesn't really give you that. It just makes 
> it
> complain about the symbols when you use them. But that can work too.

Ok, would this be fixed by allowing:
deprecated module mymodule;
and the rest of it? 




More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list