D2 port of Tango

[Fawzi Mohamed]

I think that having tango for D2 could be useful, but I would be quite disappointed if Tango would still not get along with phobos.
I understand that druntime might be quite connected to phobos releases, still there should be less reasons this time to fork also the runtime this time.
That was always a pita IMHO, and I am a happy D1/tango user.

Fawzi
On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:

> On 10/19/11, Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:
>> "zsxxsz" <zsxxsz at 63.net> wrote in message
>> news:j7mmkr$1fm0$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> I love Tango, because it's like using JAVA to program with Tango, and using
>>> 
>>> C++
>>> to program with Phobos. Java is much more easy to program.
>> 
>> Heh. The Java-ness of it is actually the one thing about Tango that I don't
>> really like. 'Course, I'm a big Java-hater anyway, YMMV...
>> 
> 
> Oh what, you don't like
> getterAbstractFactoriesBuilderFactorySingletonObjectListener?