dmd 1.070 and 2.055 release

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:44:26 -0400, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:

> Yes, that is what I meant. It already does that:
>
> struct S{
>      this() @disable;
> }
>
> class C{
>      S s;
>      this(){} // Error: constructor tt.C.this field s must be  
> initialized in constructor
> }
>
> The only thing that needs to be changed is that classes containing  
> non-default-constructible uninitialized fields can be default  
> constructed if they provide a default constructor.

Oh wow, this really is a no-brainer.  Walter?

At least there should be an enhancement report.

-Steve