Introducing vibe.d!

[Sönke Ludwig]

Am 27.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Sean Kelly:
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:27 AM, Sönke Ludwig<sludwig at outerproduct.org>  wrote:
>>
>> We still have a more comprehensive benchmark on the table but it seemed to get along happily with about 60MB of RAM usage during a C10k test. The average request time went down to about 6s if I remember correctly. The test was using a dual-core Atom server over a WiFI connection so the results may have been skewed a litte.
>
> 6s?  Not 6ms?  Why so slow?

With 10000 connections concurrently.. not exactly sure who is reposible 
but probably either the network or libevent. But some diagnostic 
benchmarking is in order.