Introducing vibe.d!

[Tove]

On Friday, 27 April 2012 at 19:40:53 UTC, F i L wrote:
> "vibe.d" as the project name is great, but why have module 
> vibe.d and not simply vibe? Or, why prefix all the types with

More complicated projects/frameworks ontop of vibe which 
implements it's own main is free to use vibe.all.

But I think...
   import vibe.d;
... makes perfect sense because it contains main()!