NaNs Just Don't Get No Respect

[Walter Bright]

On 8/18/2012 9:21 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> After actually *using* both D (default-initialization) and C#
> (statically/conservatively ensure things can't be accessed without
> being explicitly inited), and I'm convinced the benefits of the static
> checks easily outweigh the fear of a knee-jerk "=0".


I'm less willing to throw default initialization out - I like it & rely on it. 
The C# approach pretty much ends default initialization, including for user 
defined types.