Getting ready for 2.061

Jesse Phillips Jesse.K.Phillips+D at gmail.com
Sat Dec 22 15:44:00 PST 2012


On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 21:48:51 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:

> I strongly recommend requiring that all bugs be first fixed in 
> the development branch and then being pushed backwards
> through the version history.  Quite a few projects follow this 
> pattern based on the requirement that no fix can ever be
> accidentally left out of a future release.  You never want 
> someone to pick up (using made up version numbers) 3.4.2 to
> get a fix and later upgrade to 4.1.1 and find out it's not yet 
> fixed in that release.

Well, to have the easy merging the change must be made against 
the oldest applicable code. The benefit of merging into staging 
first is that staging can be merged into master, while master can 
not be merged into staging.

What is nice about making a pull request against staging is that 
the reviewer knows that the fix can be applied that far (not that 
comments wouldn't do the same).


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list