dmd 1.073 and 2.058 release

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Thursday, February 16, 2012 15:27:26 F i L wrote:
> Marco Leise wrote:
> > I'm just repeating what's already been said, but UFCS on
> > classes and structs has the problem of ambiguities with proper
> > methods of those. If 2.058 introduced more UFCS, then it is for
> > literals. Try "123.foo;".
> 
> C#'s had "UFSC" for years without ambiguity problems. Also,
> "123.foo;" doesn't work.

C# doesn't have free functions. So, how could it have UFCS?

- Jonathan M Davis