bootDoc - advanced DDoc framework using Twitter's Bootstrap

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Friday, 4 May 2012 at 14:48:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I don't see it working that way.  If I click on etc.c.sqlite3 
> for example, it doesn't collapse std.
>
> Essentially, what I mean is, I should only see the parents, 
> immediate children, and siblings of the currently selected item 
> in the tree *by default*, and then let the user expand if he's 
> interested in more.  I only suggest this for the module, though.
>
> For example, std.datetime has a huge tree, but everything is 
> expanded fully.  If all the top-level items are collapsed, then 
> I don't have to go as far to navigate for something.

Right, I didn't notice that problem, but it is indeed glaringly 
obvious with std.datetime. Will fix that, thanks!

> packages that a module is in.  For example, etc.c.sqlite3 is in 
> packages etc and c.  If we make those breadcrumbs instead of 
> part of a large tree, it can get around your worry about 
> whitespace, because they don't need separate indentation.

That's a great idea, but where in the tree would it appear? What 
would happen to the rest of the modules, should they be indented 
like they are now? Wouldn't that look a little weird?