Remus

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-11-05 18:54, Namespace wrote:
> I am considering to rewrite Remus from the ground up.
> Because I hope that Remus earn next time more interest, I would like to
> vote or discuss the features.
> As there would be:
>    - Not null references. Example: Foo& f / int& i. Maybe only for Objects?
>    - not null safe invocation. Example: some_obj?.do_something();
>    - Elvis operator. Example: Foo result = foo ?: new Foo();
>    - Stack instances with own keyword? For example, with 'local' as it
> is now.
>    - Package import? Example: import package std: stdio, array, regex;
>    - Namespaces?
>
> What is preferred by this list / what not? What should be included in
> any case in Remus / what not?

I would say yes to everything except namespaces. I would also like the 
elvis operator in combination with the assignment operator, i.e.

Foo a;
a ?:= new Foo; // only assign if "a" is null

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg