On 2012-11-06 16:15, Walter Bright wrote:
>> enum test = "test";
>>
>> [test] void foo () {}
>
> or:
>
> enum EEE;
> [EEE] void foo() { }
>
First, I didn't know you could have an empty enum. Second, that was my
point. I don't like the need for a dummy/empty enum, or the use of a
string literal.
--
/Jacob Carlborg