On 2012-11-21 21:48, Namespace wrote:
> Hm, I like the Idea.
> But I would prefer:
> private:
> int _bar in(int val) {
> _bar = val;
> } out {
> return _bar;
> }
The point was to make the syntax short. I wouldn't consider this much of
an improvement.
--
/Jacob Carlborg