Abstract Database Interface

[Jacob Carlborg]

> It's definitely not ActiveRecord, but my goal is just to take some
> inspiration from it, not to duplicate it. I'm very concerned about
> efficiency, which is why I'm using structs, and I like hard-coding the
> fields into the structure so there's some documentation of what the
> record is supposed to hold and so the compiler can optimize it more
> heavily. It will probably be a little less pretty, but it'll work, and
> that's what really matters. At some point, I might implement an
> interface to generate SQL queries with function calls, but for now, just
> manually writing the queries really isn't hard, and it provides a
> significant speed boost for systems like Sqlite that compile queries
> down to bytecode because it's easier to reuse the query object.

My point was just that you removed the key features and soul of 
ActiveRecord. Without these features it's just like any other ORM library.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg