Remus
Namespace
rswhite4 at googlemail.com
Mon Oct 29 23:34:22 PDT 2012
On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 22:09:02 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Namespace:
>
>> Not interested, huh? Funny, that I had not expected.
>
> Maybe they appreciate more something that improves the life of
> regular D programmers. There are many possible ways to do that,
> like trying to design features that quite probably will be
> added to D, or trying library ideas that will become part of
> Phobos, trying new GC features, trying new Phobos modules, and
> so on and on.
>
> Otherwise you risk creating another Delight
> (http://delight.sourceforge.net/ ) that no one uses, it's just
> a waste of time for you too.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
Yes, but I need input. Tell me some ideas and I'll try to
implement them. So you could just test new features in the real
world, instead of just talking about them theoretically.
And it is not 'waste of time'. Me and my fellow students use D as
early as the second Semester for almost all university projects.
But as '(pre) compiler' we use Remus just because we miss some
features, such as not-null references, since the first week. And
it's a damn good exercise to understand, how a compiler works. :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list