Remus
Namespace
rswhite4 at googlemail.com
Tue Oct 30 10:10:10 PDT 2012
On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 07:25:14 UTC, Rob T wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 06:34:26 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>> Yes, but I need input. Tell me some ideas and I'll try to
>> implement them. So you could just test new features in the
>> real world, instead of just talking about them theoretically.
>> And it is not 'waste of time'. Me and my fellow students use D
>> as early as the second Semester for almost all university
>> projects. But as '(pre) compiler' we use Remus just because we
>> miss some features, such as not-null references, since the
>> first week. And it's a damn good exercise to understand, how a
>> compiler works. :)
>
> I can see the value in testing ideas out in practice. I cannot
> see C++ style namespaces being all that useful given that there
> are much better alternatives already available, non-nullable
> references and AST macros would be very nice to try out. Wish
> we had these features in the real D right now.
>
> --rt
I like them. But if so many people against them, I can implement
a voting to deprecate this feature. Not-null references are
already available.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list