Epoll for D2

[bearophile]

Adil Baig:

> "are kind of (but not really) strongly typed" - I didnt know 
> that. How?

D allows code like:

enum Foo { V1 = 10 }
void main() {
     assert(Foo.V1 == 10);
}


But C++11 enums are strongly typed, and similar code is a 
compilation error:

enum class Foo { V1 = 10 };
int main() {
     int b = Foo::V1 == 10;
}


Maybe Walter thinks that in similar cases forcing the usage of 
cast(int) introduces some risks that are not worth, so he has 
designed enums half-strongly typed. D contains several other 
equally mysterious design decisions :-)

See also:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3999


> I'm thinking
> Events.* ; Events.IN, Events.HUP etc. Succinct and fairly 
> obvious. Looks good?

What about Events.in, Events.hup, etc? :-)

Bye,
bearophile