Slides from LASER 2012

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Thu Sep 20 10:32:13 PDT 2012


Le 20/09/2012 18:39, Timon Gehr a écrit :
> On 09/20/2012 04:23 PM, bearophile wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>>
>>> In particular, Martin has been quite impressed with our approach to
>>> purity and immutability. We are considering a collaboration with one
>>> of his students on a paper to formalize the approach and possibly
>>> adapt it to Scala.
>>
>> Formalizing D purity is probably possible, but it already has many
>> special cases, and few more are coming (see Bugzilla on this)!
>>
>
> Formalising it is not hard, but the D implementation will have to be
> fixed. Just decouple 'immutable' and 'pure' completely,
>
> int foo()pure{
> int x;
> immutable int y;
> void bar()pure{
> x++; // ok
> }
> int baz()pure immutable{
> return y; // ok
> }
> int foo()pure immutable{
> return x; // error
> }
> }
>
> then rename pure to somethingother and make pure a synonym for
> somethingother immutable and add that to Scala.
>

I proposed something similar in the epic delegate thread. I observe that 
thing fall together nicely with it on several topics. It seems like the 
way to go.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list