dlib - d utility library
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Sat Sep 29 05:54:22 PDT 2012
On 2012-09-28 19:47, Peter Alexander wrote:
> A note on your Vector implementation. Currently you use the vector
> operators, e.g.
>
> Vector!(T,size) opAddAssign (Vector!(T,size) v)
> body
> {
> arrayof[] += v.arrayof[];
> return this;
> }
>
> This is fine for large vectors, but (correct me if I'm wrong), your
> vector class appears to be designed for small vectors. Those vector ops
> currently call a asm optimised function that uses SIMD instructions in a
> loop - it works well for larger vectors with hundreds of elements, but
> for small vectors it's significantly faster to just use:
>
> foreach (i; 0..size)
> arrayof[i] += v.arrayof[i];
Isn't the whole point of the array operators that it gives the compiler
more semantic understanding of the code. Just as a foreach-loop does
compared to a for-loop. So the compiler should be able to optimize this
and generated the most optimal code. But the compiler might not be that
good.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list