std.process Accepted!

John Colvin john.loughran.colvin at gmail.com
Sun Apr 21 04:23:21 PDT 2013


On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:55:30 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:

> For now I say we continue as before, and work toward this new 
> approach.

Being relatively new to this community, what is the status quo 
for including new modules / rewrites of old modules? At some 
point in the next few days will std.process just become the new 
version?


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list