Arch Linux users and packagers : upcoming coomunity/dmd package change
Dicebot
m.strashun at gmail.com
Sat May 18 12:22:35 PDT 2013
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:19:10 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Agreed. I had this discussion recently too along the topic of:
> Should we
> allow people to install libphobos/libdruntime in a common
> library
> directory, or keep it private as an integral part of the
> compiler? IMO,
> giving given it's close ties between the two, it should always
> be integral,
> and the idea of linking against libphobos from an application
> written in
> something other than D is still not in any way feasible task.
I thought about asking your advice on this topic but it was not
urgent enough :) What currently prevents having different
runtimes but single phobos library for different compilers? How
hard is such setup to achieve?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list