dmd 2.063 beta 5

[Walter Bright]

On 5/23/2013 7:57 PM, bearophile wrote:
> Walter Bright:
>
>>> Even if such "naive" D programmers exist, maybe it's better to ignore this third
>>> point, because they will not be able to program in D for other reasons.
>>
>> s/naive/tired/
>> s/naive/inahurry/
>>
>> I'm surprised at you, bearophile!
>
> A safe and well designed language is not supposed to save you from using on
> purpose a switch designed to avoid you some bugs. So I don't agree with this
> third point of yours.

I think that is inconsistent with your consistent position that features that 
are easily misunderstood or misused should have more protection.

So there!