dmd 2.064.2

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Wed Nov 6 13:06:24 PST 2013


On 2013-11-06 20:57, Walter Bright wrote:

> It was intended. I felt that 2.064 => 2.064.1 would have been confusing,
> hence 2.064 => 2.064.2

That's what's happening if you start to add new digits. The first 
release should have possibly been 2.064.0. BTW, there was a 2.063.1, if 
I recall correctly.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list