code.dlang.org now supports categories and search - license information now required
ilya-stromberg
ilya-stromberg-2009 at yandex.ru
Thu Oct 17 06:45:33 PDT 2013
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 13:31:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
> On 2013-10-17 11:33, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> There has been another important change that requires existing
>> packages
>> to be updated: All packages must now have the fields
>> "description" and
>> "license" present to be published. The license field has to be
>> set
>> according to the specification [1]. All existing branches and
>> version
>> tags stay unaffected by this requirement and are still
>> available.
>
> Perhaps add the license: Apple Public Source License. This can
> be useful for creating bindings to Apple specific libraries. Is
> there a corresponding license for Microsoft?
Yes:
Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL)
Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list