DUnit: Advanced unit testing toolkit.

[Dicebot]

On Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 14:51:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> Exactly. I guess I misunderstood you. Although I would consider 
> "having lot of small independent annotated unit-test blocks" be 
> basically what you're showing above.

Beg my pardon, bad wording from my side. I was referring to 
approach when testing framework defines some sort of own testing 
DSL and uses it for test case decoupling within one unit-test 
block - as far as I understand it is what some of currently 
existing D testing frameworks do.

Key point here is that good testing library should augment 
built-in facility, not replace it. Fallback to built-ins can 
still be useful.