SDC-32bit

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 11:19:01 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 22:48:35 UTC, Shammah Chancellor 
> wrote:
>> On 2014-08-01 05:00:53 +0000, deadalnix said:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I am happy to announce that my 32bit version of sdc compiles 
>>>> the whole testsuite including mixins.
>>>> the only there are only 6 tests still failing
>>>> 2 of them are dependent on size_t.siezof beeing 8.
>>>> The otherer 4 have to do with execptoion handling.
>>>> 
>>>> please check out the 32-branches
>>>> on https://github.com/UplinkCoder/sdc
>>>> and https://github.com/UplinkCoder/libd-llvm
>>>> and https://github.com/UplinkCoder/libd
>>>> 
>>>> I haven't yet updated the submodules so you have to fetch 
>>>> the 32-branch manually.
>>>> 
>>>> and remember that this is experimental!
>>>> please file issues on in my repo if your errors appear with 
>>>> both -m64 and -m32.
>>>> 
>>>> if there are any questions please ask them.
>>> 
>>> A bit late, but that is awesome. I need to go through all of 
>>> this and am in holidays right now. #1 on the todo list when i 
>>> come back.
>>
>> Also, it looks by using your fiber based scheduler that you 
>> can naturally parallize compiling.  Have you investigated that 
>> at all?
>
> I have planned to add async IO through vibe.d. that alone just 
> grant huge speedups. I also want to integrate SQLite or redis 
> based incremental compilation. I don`t think we can beat dmd 
> soon. But I think we can come much closer :D

Any idea what the significant bottlenecks are / what dmd is much 
faster at?