Bounty for -minimal compiler flag
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 15 21:27:07 PST 2014
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 23:53:19 -0500, Denis Koroskin <2korden at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 02:57:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> I think that the best and quickest approach at this time is to disallow
>> classes. They are not trivial. If we can figure out a clean way to add
>> them back, then they can be allowed later.
>>
>
> Note that the same applies to classes with ARC (or other reference
> counting mechanism).
Right, but ARC classes would be marked differently or derive from a
different base. Like extern(C++) classes (which actually should work under
minimal D).
What we are debating is allowing just plain-old D classes could compile
and be used under minimal D. I don't think that's a good idea.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list