Bounty for -minimal compiler flag

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 15 21:27:07 PST 2014


On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 23:53:19 -0500, Denis Koroskin <2korden at gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 02:57:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> I think that the best and quickest approach at this time is to disallow  
>> classes. They are not trivial. If we can figure out a clean way to add  
>> them back, then they can be allowed later.
>>
>
> Note that the same applies to classes with ARC (or other reference  
> counting mechanism).

Right, but ARC classes would be marked differently or derive from a  
different base. Like extern(C++) classes (which actually should work under  
minimal D).

What we are debating is allowing just plain-old D classes could compile  
and be used under minimal D. I don't think that's a good idea.

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list