dmd 2.065 beta 1 #2
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 00:31:58 PST 2014
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> I prefer:
>
> 2.65~b1
> 2.65~rc1
>
> because "2.65.0" and "2.65" are bigger than "2.65~rc1",
> regardless if "qualifier" number is present or not in final
> release version.
>
> I think that, as much as possible, we should use exactly the
> same version string for all installers, zip, deb, rpm, dmg, etc.
> So if there is no problem on OSX, Windows, etc. I propose this
> versioning scheme:
>
> #.#~b# ==> 2.65~b1 // beta
> #.#~rc# ==> 2.65~rc1 // release candidate
> #.#.# ==> 2.65.0 // initial release
> #.#.# ==> 2.65.1 // hotfix
Please, this has been discussed to death already. Nobody care
what anybody prefers. Unless you have an actual reason to ask for
a format change (fit better with current packaging systems for
instance) please restrain yourself.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list