std.signal : voting results

[David Nadlinger]

On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 15:44:07 UTC, Johannes Pfau 
wrote:
> Phobos has a very strict "don't break backwards compatibility 
> rule".
> IMHO too strict, but that's the way it is.

This is also the reason why I would have voted "no" if I made it 
in time. Documentation and implementation can be fixed later, but 
we would have had to support a borderline-broken API (with 
regards to type stringification) for the foreseeable future.

David