DMD 2.066 Alpha

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 6/12/14, 8:49 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On 6/12/2014 11:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 6/12/14, 7:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>
>>> It
>>> 1. allows escaping final, which we can't do without it or an equivalent
>>> 2. does exactly what everybody expects
>>> 3. is already implemented
>>> 4. looks much nicer than your proposal
>>>
>>> Why not just leave it in?  I'm already using it, and it makes
>>> extern(C++) classes MUCH more readable (ie DDMD)
>>
>> Please no new keyword for what can be done already. It's not
>> proportional response.
>>
>
> AFAIK, escaping final *can't* be done.

It can be worked around. -- Andrei