DerelictSASS

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 2014-11-23 01:26, Mike Parker wrote:

> Some people may prefer the bindings to include more D features, but IMO
> if you're going to put something out there for everyone and anyone to
> use, particularly if you want to be consistent with other Derelict
> bindings, it's better to avoid them.

For more D features I would add a thin layer on top of the raw bindings. 
Like creating wrappers for functions accepting C strings and have them 
accept D strings instead.

In this particular case I would probably have created the enum as one 
would do in D and the alias the enum members to make them accessible at 
module scope.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg