Cerealed v0.6.1: even less boilerplate for binary serialization

TC via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Mon Aug 3 07:56:42 PDT 2015


On Monday, 3 August 2015 at 12:21:05 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
> On Monday, 3 August 2015 at 11:51:24 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> Yes. `cerealise` and `decerealise`. The former is slightly 
>> weird for performance reasons. It takes a lambda that tells it 
>> what to do with the resulting bytes.
>>
>> Close with LDC and DMD, faster with GDC: 
>> http://forum.dlang.org/post/nkcelouzpjsgmqtvnonq@forum.dlang.org
>
> Nice!
>
> Are there any plans to add different backends (for instance 
> msgpack) to Cereal? Then we could have one package to rule them 
> all!
>
> I'll try Cereal in favor of msgpack next time!
>
> Thanks, Atila!

As I tried the changes on the same test as in [0]
It went on my PC like this:

DMD debug:
Cerealed: 2 secs, 854 ms, 687 μs, and 2 hnsecs
MsgPack:  2 secs, 328 ms, 698 μs, and 3 hnsecs

DMD release:
Cerealed: 1 sec, 619 ms, 570 μs, and 9 hnsecs
MsgPack:  1 sec, 554 ms, and 185 μs

LDC2 release:
Cerealed: 966 ms, 398 μs, and 4 hnsecs
MsgPack:  926 ms, 792 μs, and 3 hnsecs

GDC release:
Cerealed: 1 sec, 97 ms, 892 μs, and 1 hnsec
MsgPack:  1 sec, 138 ms, 359 μs, and 2 hnsecs

So it's almost the same now.

[0] 
http://forum.dlang.org/post/nkcelouzpjsgmqtvnonq@forum.dlang.org


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list